Special and general relativity are often presented as revolutionary insights into space and time: simultaneity is relative, time dilates, length contracts, gravity bends spacetime. At first glance, these seem like statements about physical deformation — reality shifting under speed or mass. But this presentation still presumes a substrate: a spacetime in which entities reside and move, warped by energy or velocity.
A relational ontology offers a different reading. Relativity is not about deforming a background; it is about how systems constrain what counts as a shared configuration. Simultaneity, locality, and even geometry are not pre-existing containers for experience. They are systemic agreements — outcomes of how coordinated potentials cohere under perspective.
Relativity, in this sense, is not primarily a theory of motion, but a theory of construal.
1. Simultaneity as Systemic Coordination
-
In Einstein’s formulation, simultaneity is not absolute: what counts as “at the same time” depends on the observer’s frame of reference,
-
This is not a problem to be solved — it is a sign that time is perspectival,
-
From a relational perspective, simultaneity is not a global clock, but a coordination of affordances: an agreement about phase coherence within a system.
2. Spacetime as a Relational Manifold
-
Spacetime is often reified as a four-dimensional stage — curved in general relativity, flat in special relativity,
-
But a relational ontology does not treat spacetime as a container,
-
Instead, “spacetime” is the structured potential for relational configuration: a topology of constraint within which systems cohere.
3. Motion as Relational Variation
-
In Newtonian terms, motion is the change of position over time within absolute space,
-
In relativity, motion is always relative — there is no privileged frame,
-
From the relational view, motion is a differential in relational constraint: it is not the movement of a thing, but a shift in how a system realigns its coherence across perspectives.
4. Gravity as Gradient of Affordance
-
General relativity describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime — objects follow geodesics in a curved manifold,
-
But what “curves” is not space, but the grammar of affordance: what counts as a straight path shifts with mass-energy distributions,
-
In relational terms, gravity is a reweighting of potential — systems under tension resolve differently depending on how their constraints are locally structured.
5. Relativity as Relational Grammar
-
The genius of relativity is not in discovering that time slows or space curves,
-
It is in recognising that our descriptions must adjust with perspective — that coherence depends on how systems align their internal constraints,
-
This is a fundamentally semiotic insight: the world does not come pre-cut into instants or intervals. These are products of construal — the grammar of interpretation under systemic coordination.
Closing
Relativity is not the final geometry of the universe. It is the recognition that there is no geometry without construal — no space or time without the relational systems that make their articulation possible. What appears as a warping of spacetime is, more deeply, a reconfiguration of coherent potential under constraint.
In the next post, we will examine quantum measurement — often treated as the point at which reality becomes “real” — and explore how a relational ontology reframes measurement not as revelation, but as a resolution of potential through construal.
No comments:
Post a Comment