Time in quantum theory is paradoxical. In most formulations, it appears not as an observable, like position or momentum, but as an external parameter — a fixed backdrop against which quantum states evolve. Unlike other physical quantities, there is no time operator in standard quantum mechanics. Time is assumed, not observed.
But this assumption becomes problematic when applied to closed systems — especially the universe as a whole. If there is no external clock, how can time flow? And how do we make sense of timelessness in formulations like the Wheeler–DeWitt equation, where quantum cosmology appears static?
In a relational ontology, such difficulties are not pathologies to be patched. They are clues. They suggest that time is not a universal parameter but an emergent feature of systemic reconfiguration. Quantum time is not what flows, but what emerges when constrained potential actualises in sequence.
1. Time as a Construct of Constraint
-
Standard quantum mechanics treats time as a parameter in Schrödinger’s equation: an input, not a variable,
-
But this framing presumes an external observer — a context that does not exist for the total system,
-
Relationally, time is not something systems exist “in” — it is a way of describing how constrained systems transform,
-
It is not external to the field but a dimension of the field’s self-reconfiguration.
2. No Time Before Actualisation
-
Before measurement, a quantum system evolves unitarily — reversibly, deterministically — with no intrinsic arrow of time,
-
The passage of time is not apparent until a system selects an outcome through interaction with constraint,
-
In relational terms, time emerges at the interface of construal and transformation — it is the index of how one configuration gives way to another.
3. Irreversibility as Ontological Shift
-
Standard quantum theory is time-symmetric; the equations run equally well forward or backward,
-
Yet measurement appears to introduce irreversibility — a collapse that cannot be undone,
-
This apparent contradiction dissolves in a relational view: what we call irreversibility is the resolution of systemic tension,
-
Once a relational field has actualised a stable coherence, the prior superposed potential is no longer structurally supported — not because it is forbidden, but because the constraints have shifted.
4. Duration as Relational Metric
-
Clocks do not measure time “as it is”; they register change in a reference system,
-
In quantum mechanics, such reference systems must be internal — every “clock” is just another part of the field,
-
Time becomes not a universal container but a local metric of transformation, defined only relative to relational dynamics,
-
There is no master time — only the differential pacing of coordinated actualisations within a field of constraint.
5. Temporal Order as Emergent Construal
-
Events do not “happen in time”; they instantiate time — each actualisation punctuates the potential with a distinct ordering,
-
The arrow of time, then, is not imposed but emergent: a bias in the system toward configurations of increasing stability or informational complexity,
-
What we experience as temporal flow is a systemic gradient of resolution — a choreography of construals cascading through the field.
Closing
Quantum theory does not reveal a universe unfolding in time. It reveals a universe in which time itself unfolds — not as a line we move along, but as a texture woven into the transformation of constrained potential. Time is not “out there” ticking away. It is a phase of relation, a rhythm of actualisation, an emergent index of the field’s becoming.
In the next post, we will address causality, and explore how quantum entanglement, temporal symmetry, and relational transformation demand a redefinition of cause itself — no longer as pushing and pulling, but as patterned coherence across differentiated actualisation.
No comments:
Post a Comment