Entanglement is widely seen as quantum theory’s strangest feature. Two particles become entangled, and measuring one instantly determines the state of the other — even if they are light-years apart. Einstein famously called this “spooky action at a distance,” suspecting some deeper mechanism or “hidden variable” beneath the surface.
But what if the strangeness is not in the world, but in the way we try to describe it? From a relational perspective, entanglement is not a puzzle to be solved by positing unseen influences. It is a sign that the system is not decomposable into independent parts. Entanglement reveals the limits of atomistic ontology — and the need to think in terms of coherence, not components.
1. From Correlation to Coherence
-
In standard accounts, entanglement is described as a correlation between measurement outcomes,
-
But these correlations are not between separate things. They reflect the coherence of a single relational configuration,
-
Entangled “particles” are not two objects in communication — they are a single, nonseparable system actualising across multiple points.
2. The Failure of Factorisation
-
Classical systems can be factorised: their state space is the product of their parts,
-
Entangled quantum systems defy this. Their joint state cannot be reduced to any combination of local states,
-
This is not a quirk — it’s a sign that relational coherence precedes individuated being.
3. Relational Identity Over Object Identity
-
In entanglement, the “identity” of each particle is not fixed. What counts as “the state of particle A” depends on the state of the whole,
-
This undermines the idea that particles have intrinsic properties. Instead, identity is relational — it arises from the structure of the system,
-
What is entangled is not the properties of pre-existing things, but the potential for coherent actualisation across a shared topology.
4. No Signal, No Paradox
-
Entanglement does not involve faster-than-light signalling or action at a distance,
-
There is no causal transmission from one particle to another — because there are no separate particles,
-
The apparent “instantaneity” is a feature of how constraints resolve across the system — not a story of one affecting the other, but a coherence realised nonlocally.
5. Entanglement as a Limit Condition for Local Description
-
Entanglement marks the boundary where object-based thinking breaks down,
-
It shows that some phenomena cannot be understood as properties of parts, but only as system-level configurations,
-
From a relational-ontological standpoint, entanglement is a local manifestation of global constraint — a pattern of possibility that exceeds localisation.
Closing
Entanglement is not evidence of quantum weirdness. It is evidence that the world is not made of parts. Where classical physics sees independence, quantum theory reveals relational entanglement as primary. Coherence is not derived from things; things are derived from coherence.
In the next post, we will turn to the question of individuation — how local beings emerge from relational potential, and why identity must be rethought as a systemic phenomenon.
No comments:
Post a Comment