In classical physics, momentum is defined as the product of mass and velocity. It captures how difficult it is to stop a moving object — its “quantity of motion.” Momentum is conserved in closed systems, making it a foundational concept in both mechanics and field theory. In quantum mechanics, it becomes a generator of translation and a central operator in wavefunction dynamics.
But momentum, like energy and force, inherits its conceptual frame from an object-based metaphysics: entities with mass, moving through space, carrying motion with them. In this worldview, momentum is something an object has, which can be transferred, exchanged, or conserved.
From a relational perspective, however, momentum is not a substance or property carried by an object. It is a pattern of persistence — an emergent feature of a system’s tendency to maintain coherence across a sequence of transformations.
1. No Entities, No Motion
-
If there are no autonomous particles moving through space, then there is no “mass” in motion to begin with,
-
Momentum cannot be a thing possessed; it must be a feature of the relational dynamics of a system unfolding over time,
-
It is not what an object carries — it is how a configuration maintains its trajectory of coherence under constraint.
2. Momentum as Relational Continuity
-
Classical momentum describes resistance to change in motion,
-
Relationally, this maps to inertia in the space of configurations: the tendency of a coherent relational pattern to continue actualising along a constrained path,
-
What persists is not a substance in transit, but a directional unfolding of relational structure.
3. Temporal Gradient, Not Trajectory
-
Instead of imagining a particle moving through space, imagine a relational field undergoing successive states,
-
Momentum becomes the gradient of actualisation through which a system continues resolving its potential in a given direction of transformation,
-
It is a feature of how time is inhabited — not how things move, but how systems sustain change.
4. Quantum Momentum Reinterpreted
-
In quantum mechanics, momentum is associated with spatial translation: the wavefunction’s response to shifts in position,
-
But the wavefunction itself is not a thing in space — it is a configuration of potential over relational degrees of freedom,
-
Thus, momentum is best understood as the rate of change in coherence across relational coordinates — a generator of systemic unfolding, not a mark of motion.
5. Conservation as Constraint Compatibility
-
In classical systems, momentum is conserved because interactions respect symmetries of space and time,
-
Relationally, these “conservation laws” express the internal consistency of transformations under constraint — patterns of coherence preserved through reconfiguration,
-
Momentum is conserved not because something is kept the same, but because the structure of constraints remains compatible with persistence.
Toward a Relational Definition
We might say:
Momentum is the systemic tendency of a coherent configuration to maintain its directional unfolding across constraint transitions.
This replaces the image of mass in motion with a more abstract, but more accurate, account of how systems persist — not by travelling through space, but by actualising continuity in a dynamic field of potential.
Closing
Momentum, in the classical view, is a property of moving matter. But in a relational ontology, momentum is a pattern of persistence: the unfolding of a system along its most coherent path through possibility space. It is not motion through space — it is continuity in becoming.
In the next post, we’ll examine mass itself — not as an intrinsic quantity of matter, but as a relational index of constraint: how strongly a configuration resists transformation under systemic pressure.
No comments:
Post a Comment