The concept of objectivity—knowledge of reality independent of any observer—is a cornerstone of classical science. Reality is assumed to have fixed properties “out there,” discoverable through measurement.
Quantum mechanics and relativity challenge this ideal:
-
Measurement outcomes depend on context and interaction,
-
Observers influence what is observed,
-
Reality resists a single, absolute description.
A relational ontology offers a reframing: objectivity and reality are emergent, perspectival, and systemic rather than absolute and detached.
1. Classical Objectivity and Its Limits
-
Objectivity assumes observer independence,
-
Reality is a set of intrinsic properties,
-
Challenges arise from measurement problems and contextuality.
2. Quantum Contextuality and Relativity of Observers
-
Outcomes depend on experimental setup and frame,
-
No observer-independent quantum state exists,
-
Reality is deeply perspectival.
3. Relational Objectivity as Systemic Coherence
-
Objectivity emerges from stable patterns of relational construal,
-
Different observers access overlapping but partial views,
-
Reality is a field of coherent potential actualised differently across perspectives.
4. Implications for Understanding Reality
-
Reality is neither wholly subjective nor absolute,
-
Scientific knowledge is a network of consistent relational construals,
-
This supports pluralism without relativism.
Closing
Objectivity and reality are no longer about detached observation of fixed things. They are dynamic, relational achievements emerging from systemic coherence and shared construal.
Next, we will explore how this relational view informs ongoing quests for unifying quantum theory and relativity.
No comments:
Post a Comment