Quantum field theory (QFT) is often considered the most successful framework in modern physics. It describes particles as excitations of underlying fields — not as tiny objects flying through space, but as localised modes of field behaviour. Yet even QFT is frequently interpreted through a residual particle-based lens: fields are said to "generate" particles, which then behave as entities.
A relational ontology cuts deeper: fields themselves are not substances, but structures of constraint and coherence — relational configurations that afford the emergence of observable effects.
1. The Particle Myth in Quantum Field Theory
-
Popular accounts often depict quantum fields as vast media “filled with particles” waiting to pop into existence,
-
This sustains an object-based metaphysics, where particles are “what’s real,” and fields are mechanisms for producing them,
-
But QFT shows that particles are not fundamental — they are context-bound features of interaction.
2. Fields as Relational Structures
-
A quantum field is not a substance spread out in space; it is a structured potential for actualisation,
-
What appears as a particle is a punctuation in the field — a momentary coherence shaped by the constraints of interaction,
-
There is no field “behind” the particle; the particle is simply how the field resolves under specific constraints.
3. Context-Dependence and Observer-Relativity
-
Different observers (e.g. inertial vs. accelerated) do not agree on what constitutes a “particle”,
-
The Unruh effect shows that particle detection is not absolute, but depends on the state of motion,
-
This supports the relational view: what is actualised depends on the relational configuration, not on an objective inventory of things.
4. Implications for Ontology
-
The field is not a physical backdrop but a relational topology — a space of constrained potential in which phenomena emerge,
-
Particle interactions are events of coherence within this topology, not collisions of independent objects,
-
Thus, QFT offers a natural bridge to a fully relational ontology, if we stop trying to recover a particle-based picture from it.
Closing
Quantum field theory does not describe particles in fields. It describes events of actualisation in a landscape of constraint. The reality it reveals is not granular but relational — not built from stuff, but shaped by structured possibility.
In the next post, we will explore how this relational framing of quantum fields prepares the ground for engaging with relativity — and the relational ontology of spacetime itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment