In classical mechanics, mass is a fundamental property — a measure of how much matter an object contains, or how much it resists acceleration. In quantum field theory, mass becomes more abstract: particles acquire mass through interaction with fields (notably the Higgs), and massless particles (like photons) behave quite differently.
But from a relational ontological perspective, mass is not a substance nor a fixed attribute. It is best understood as a measure of relational resistance — a dynamic expression of how readily a given potential configuration yields to transformation under constraint.
1. Classical Concepts of Mass
Traditionally, mass is defined in two related ways:
-
Inertial mass: resistance to acceleration (F = ma),
-
Gravitational mass: the source of gravitational attraction (Newton's law of gravitation).
In Newtonian mechanics, these are assumed to be equivalent — a curious empirical fact without theoretical explanation.
In relativity, mass and energy are related (E = mc²), and in field theory, mass emerges through symmetry-breaking and interaction. The deeper one looks, the less “mass” resembles a property of a thing.
2. A Relational View: Mass as Resistance to Actualisation
In relational ontology:
-
There are no particles with mass; instead, coherent patterns of relation exhibit differential resistance to transformation,
-
Mass is not “what a thing has” but how tightly it is embedded within a relational field,
-
More massive configurations are less susceptible to reconfiguration — they are relationally dense, requiring greater energetic tension to shift.
Thus, mass indexes relational inertia, not substance.
3. The Higgs Field Reframed
In the Standard Model:
-
The Higgs field permeates the vacuum, and particles acquire mass through interaction with it,
-
The more strongly a particle interacts with the Higgs field, the more massive it is.
From a relational standpoint:
-
The Higgs field can be seen as a topological constraint on the field of potential,
-
What appears as “interaction” is a limitation in how flexibly coherence can shift within that domain,
-
Mass is thus not conferred by the field, but emerges from how relational transitions are structured and resisted within the systemic whole.
4. Mass and Relational Topology
We might say:
-
A photon is “massless” not because it lacks substance, but because its coherence propagates freely across the relational field,
-
A Higgs boson is massive because its configuration strongly anchors local coherence — it resists displacement within the wider topology,
-
Mass arises when degrees of freedom are tightly coupled, inhibiting variation and stabilising structure.
Mass, then, marks a bottleneck in the relational field’s capacity to redistribute potential.
5. Implications and Interpretive Shifts
Understanding mass relationally allows us to:
-
Avoid reifying it as a “thing” or intrinsic feature of objects,
-
See all mass as emergent from systemic constraint, not added to particles by external agents,
-
Recast “mass-energy equivalence” as a relational tension equivalence — mass and energy both measure the cost of transformation under constraint.
Closing
Mass is not a mysterious glue or intrinsic substance. It is the signature of how coherence resists transformation within a dynamic relational field. Inertia is not a property of particles, but a pattern of constrained potential — a stabilised reluctance to change.
In our next post, we’ll take up the notion of particles themselves — and ask whether they really exist at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment